- 00:52:25.9 Sto V-4, no. 16 in the 1st ed. of the S-star catalog. Weak carbon according to Feast
- et al, Obs. 97, 140, 1977.
- 01:20.4 D 209. No Case plates. A visual double in the Case 36" Cassegrain, 9" in 315d.
- Mag. difference approx. .5 mag.
- 02:46.1 S 52. A different star from the nearby S 51. Any ZrO that may be present is too weak
- to make this star interesting.
- 03:03:41.6 Sto V-44. This appears to be LTT 1479, an M dwarf. It is also a Luyten double star,
- but the cpm companion is more distant than the nearby star mentioned by Sto.
- 04:14.1 SX Cam. K's classification was a quote from Bidelman, who later decided (Bid65) that he
- had taken the wrong star, viz. no. 90 of this catalog. On an infrared objective prism
- plate I confirm the Bid65 spectral type of late M for SX Cam.
- 06:39.5 Same as another star in the same discovery paper; declination sign should be minus.
- Corrected in Abast. Bull. 47, 10.
- 07:49:36.4 No. 942 in my carbon star catalog, 1st ed.
- 08:36:07.3 No. 1253 in my carbon star catalog, 1st ed.
- 08:46:16.3 Sto IV-12. No. 1309 in the 1st ed. of my carbon star catalog; subsequently confirmed as
- such on a 10-degree red objective prism plate (MacCon, Ste).
- 09:50:00.3 Wray 173. No. 18 in the catalog of Wolf-Rayet stars by Roberts, Astron. J. 67, 79,
- 1962. L. Smith, Monthly Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 138, 109, 1968 finds B9e? from a slit
- spectrogram. Henize, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 30, 491, 1976 suggests that a planetary neb-
- ula is involved. On a Tololo red-region plate I find a possible weak H alpha emission
- overlapping an early-type spectrum.
- 13:38:50.1 Sto IV-50. This seems to be LTT 5330, a probable M dwarf.
- 16:45.3 Henun 169. Reclassified in Rybski's thesis; should have been included in my rejected S
- stars table in the 1st ed. of this catalog.
- 17:07:49 TV Dra. The Balz reference is to McCormick Publ. Vol. 13, part 1.
- 17:19:48 ST Ser. I do not know the source of the GCVS spectral type.
- 17:53:56 HR 6702 = OP Her = HD 163990(Mb). Reclassified M5 IIb-IIIa by Keenan in Basic Astrono-
- mical Data.
- 18:02:02 VX Sgr. My red plates, several in number, are all overexposed.
- 18:05.7 S-WS 5. No. 2544 in the 1st ed. of my carbon star catalog.
- 18:08:16.2 No. 549 in the 1st ed. of the S-star catalog, and no. 2552 in the 1st carbon star cata-
- log. Originally classified S from a red objective prism plate, on which it was however
- peculiar; looks much the same way on a recent one, and not very S-like. Looks like a
- carbon star on the 3400 A/mm infrared objective prism plate used for that original dis-
- covery, but not on four others including one recent one. No secure evidence for light
- variability.
- 18:24.0 D 4847. Appears to be either T Ser or BN Ser, both of which are M stars (5).
- 20:00:44.0 Included as S by NassSte through clerical error; it is an H alpha-emission star, and
- slipped into the wrong list.
- 20:35.6 S-WS 64. Reddened M according to Pesch, Astrophys. J. 149, L65, 1967; M4 by Vogt,
- Astron. J. 78, 389, 1973.
- 21:00.7 RV Aqr. A good N star, no. 2968 in my carbon star catalog 1st ed. The Dearborn obser-
- vers thought the red-region spectrum resembled that of GP Ori (SC).
- 22:44.6 S-WS 43. The S-WS position was derived by offsetting from a nearby B.D. star, but the
- B.D. number quoted for it is nowhere near the published S-star position. I have also
- examined spectral plates covering the position exactly 1h of r.a. different from this,
- with equal lack of success.